Introduction


The purpose of this forum is to introduce notable papers and books published by you and other persons. The work can be new or old, but it should be of wide interest and high quality. A brief comment on the significance of the work should be attached. The current categories of the subjects are (1) adaptation, (2) behavioral evolution, (3) dosage compensation, (4) evo-devo, (5) gene evolution, (6) genomic evolution, (7) molecular phylogeny, (8) natural selection, (9) phenotypic evolution, (10) sensory receptors, (11) sex chromosomes, (12) sex determination, (13) speciation, (14) symbiosis and evolution, and (15) horizontal gene transfer. However, new categories can be added if necessary. Emphasis will be given on the biological work rather than on the mathematical. Any person may post a paper by sending it to one of the editors listed below. We also welcome your comments on posted work, but we moderate all the comments to control spam. This forum is primarily for scientific discussion and to construct a database for good molecular evolution papers.


Showing posts with label Symbiosis and evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Symbiosis and evolution. Show all posts

Friday, July 6, 2012

Gene Transfer from Organelles to Nuclei Visualized

Contributed by: Zhenguo Lin


It has been generally accepted that mitochondria and chloroplasts in eukaryotic cells  originated from ancestral free-living prokaryotes through endosymbiosis.  Compared with their free-living sibling prokaryotes (proteobacteria and cyanobacteria), which contain over 3,000 genes, the genome sizes of mitochondria and chloroplasts are much smaller. The mitochondrial genome encodes a few to about 70 proteins, whereas the chloroplast genome produces 20 to 200 proteins. Therefore, a major challenge of the endosymbiosis hypothesis is to explain the difference in genome size between the organelles and their free-living counterparts.
It has been shown that many proteins encoded by the nuclear genome are essential for the function of chloroplasts and mitochondria, suggesting that genes have been relocated from the ancestral organelle to the nucleus during evolution. The gene transfer from organelles to nuclei has been supported by many bioinformatics and genomics studies. In one of the well-known studies, Martin el al. showed that approximately 18% of the nuclear genes in Arabidopsis come from the ancestral chloroplast genome (1). In addition, several experimental studies showed that the translocation of genes from organelles to nuclei indeed occurs and that the translocation process is still ongoing. In fact, using the nucleus-specific marker gene approach, Huang et al. (2) showed that the marker gene was integrated into a nuclear chromosome in 16 out of 250,000 tobacco seedlings, which provided the first experimental measurement of the frequency of gene transfer from chloroplasts to nuclei.
Although the optimal growth temperature for tobacco plants is around 25 °C, they regularly encounter much higher temperature in nature and the temperature might exceed 40 °C in leaf due to radiant heating effect. In a recent PNAS paper (3), Wang et al. reported that gene transfer from organelles to nuclei can be increased up to 10-fold under mild heat stress.  In this study, the authors placed a nucleus-specific reporter gene (gus) into the tobacco chloroplast genome.  Because the expression of the reporter gus is driven by 35S promoter and terminator and the gene contain a nuclear intron, the translation of gus in chloroplasts cannot occur. The reporter gus gene can be expressed only if the gene is transferred to nuclei, and the expression can be visualized as blue sectors in cells by histochemical staining of the gus product. Using this technique, the authors have examined the effects of various stress conditions on the organelle to nucleus gene transfer: including the treatment with heat, salt, hydrogen peroxide and paraquat. The authors found that mild heat stress (45 °C) has the strongest effect on the gene transfer (Figure 1).
Why does heat stress increase the gene transfer? To answer this question, the authors treated a tobacco plant containing GFP (Green  Florescence Protein) in its chloroplast genome with heat stress. They found that the GFP florescence was widespread in the cell after heat stress, while in the plant without heat treatment GFP florescence colocalized in chloroplasts. The authors concluded that heat stress disrupts chloroplast membranes and release DNA into the cytosol, which could facilitate the transfer of organellar genes into nuclei. Considering that the translocation of organellar genes to nuclei is remarkably high under ideal growth condition (2) and the growth condition in real world is much more variable, the influx of organellar genes into nuclei could be much more frequent than generally recognized and this process could be an important source of mutations for nuclear genomes.

Figure. 1. Plastid-to-nucleus gene transfer in heat-stressed tobacco seedlings: time course of heat treatment. (A) Histochemical staining of whole seedlings. Seedlings were grown for 2 weeks at 25 °C, treated at 45 °C for the indicated times, and allowed to recover at 25 °C for 2 days before staining for gus expression. (B) RT-PCR of gus mRNA with (+) and without (−) reverse transcriptase after heat stress (hr). The positive control gs1.1 (20) is a plant line containing a nuclear copy of gus. rpl25 mRNA RT-PCR was used as a technical and loading control. (C) Spliced gus mRNA levels relative to rpl25 mRNA. Gus mRNA was significantly increased in the 5 hour sample compared with the 0 hour control (P < 0.05, two-sample Independent t test). (D) The memory of heat stress. The 2-week-old plants with two leaves and two cotyledons were treated at 45 °C for 0 or 5 hours and allowed to recover for 1 month before GUS staining. (Scale bars: 3 mm.) (Scale bars: 3 mm.)


References
1. Martin, W., Rujan, T., Richly, E., Hansen, A., Cornelsen, S., Lins, T., Leister, D., Stoebe, B., Hasegawal, M., and Penny, D. 2002. Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12246–12251.
2. Huang, CY., Ayliffe, MA., and Timmis, JN. 2003. Direct measurement of the transfer rate of chloroplast DNA into the nucleus. Nature 422, 72–76.
3. Wang, D., Lloyd, AH., and Timmis, JN . 2012. Environmental stress increases the entry of cytoplasmic organellar DNA into the nucleus in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(7):2444-8.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Instant Insecticide Resistance by Symbiosis


Contributed by: Zhenguo Lin


In the first half of the 20th century, chemical pesticides began to be widely used to control a variety of pest species. In her 1962 groundbreaking book Silent Spring, Rachel Carson argued that insects are building up resistance to pesticides. Sadly, as Carson foretold, cases of resistance surfaced within two to 20 years after the introduction of every kind of new insecticide.
It is generally believed that the development of pesticide resistance is generated by changes of genetic information in the pest's genomes and it takes many generations for the pesticide resistant genes to spread in the population. However, some short cuts of acquiring pesticide resistance actually exist. As discussed in my previous blog, it is found that European house mice stole a rodenticide resistant gene through hybridization with Algerian mice (1). In a recent PNAS paper (2) , Kikuchi et al. found an unexpected mechanism of rapid acquisition of insecticide resistance from bacterial symbionts in bean bugs and stinky bugs, which are major pests in agriculture.
Fenitrothion is an organophosphate insecticide that acts as an inhibitor of cholinesterase, so that the nerve function is damaged in insects, humans, and many other animals. Fenitrothion has been heavily used to kill a wide range of pests. However, it has been found that repeated application of fenitrothion leads to rapid increase of fenitrothion-degrading microbes, including some species in the bacterial genus of Burkholderia. These bacteria are able to breakdown feritrothion into products that can be used as their carbon source.
Burkholderia are able to inhabit prosperously in the midgut of the bean bugs as symbionts. The infected bean bugs tend to grow bigger than uninfected bugs, showing mutual benefits of symbiosis.  Kikuchi et al. infected the bean bugs with six different Burkholderia species (strains): three of them are fenitrothion-degrading and the others are non-degrading (Figure 1) . They found that the bean bug infected with fenitrothion-degrading Burkholderia has much higher survival rates than those bugs infected with non-degrading Burkholderia, because the degraded fenitrothion is almost non-toxic to bugs. This study indicates that the insects can become resistant to fenitrothion instantly after they swallow these fenitrothion-degrading bacteria.
Interestingly, unlike many other insects, the offspring of bean bugs does not inherit Burkholderia from their mothers. The bean bugs need to pick the Burkholderia symbionts from surrounding soils each generation before reaching the adult stage. This seems to be inefficient, but it reduces the possibility that the fenitrothion-degrading bacteria become so dependent on their hosts that they lose their chemical-detoxifying genes. In addition, the authors found that the resistant Burkholderia species can increase rapidly in soil after treated with fenitrothion even though these bacteria are very rare in natural environments. The fenitrothion-degrading species rapidly become the most dominant group (>80%) in the Burkholderia population after merely one month of fenitrothion treatment. Therefore, bean bugs can easily acquire pesticide resistance because the resistance may have already developed in the bacterial population even before the arrival of insects. In addition, considering that the highly diversified enzymatic functions of bacteria are able to detoxify many different pesticide, the acquisition of instant pesticide resistances from these bacterial symbionts will definitely bring new challenges for the efficiency of insecticides.



Figure 1.
Insecticide resistance of R. pedestris infected with fenitrothion-degrading Burkholderia strains. (A and B) Survival of third instar nymphs of R. pedestris infected with the fenitrothion-degrading and nondegrading Burkholderia strains when reared on fenitrothion-coated soybean seeds. Results under the host genetic background TKS-1 (A) and TKA-7 (B) are shown. Mean and SE of 10 replicates are indicated at each data point. Each asterisk indicates that survival rate of the insects infected with the fenitrothion-degrading Burkholderiastrain is significantly higher than survival rate of the insects infected with the allied nondegrading strain (likelihood ratio test; P < 0.01). (Cand D) Resistance of Burkholderia-infected R. pedestris to percutaneous application (C) and oral administration (D) of fenitrothion. Third instar nymphs, which were infected either with the fenitrothion-degrading Burkholderia strain (SFA1) or with the nondegrading Burkholderia strain (RPE67), were administrated with 30 pmol of fenitrothion, and their survival was inspected 24 h later. On each of the columns is shown number of surviving insects/total number of treated insects. Statistically significant differences in the survival rates are shown (Fisher’s exact probability test). (2)




References
1. Song, Y.,  Endepols, S.,  Klemann, N., Richter, D.,  Matuschka, F.R., Shih, C.H., Nachman, M.W., and Kohn, M.H. 2011. Adaptive introgression of anticoagulant rodent poison resistance by hybridization between Old World mice. Current Biology 21:1296-1301
2. Kikuchi Y, Hayatsu M, Hosokawa T, Nagayama A, Tago K, Fukatsu T. 2012. Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8618–8622